and lectures notes reflecting on the positions of Martin Luther, John Calvin, and Richard Hooker. Construct your answer into the following 3 parts:
Part 1: In 1 paragraph of at least 100 words, explain why you believe 1 particular theologian’s views on government best reflects biblical Christianity. The important point is not which individual you choose but how well you explain and defend your choice. Be specific.
Parts 2 and 3: In 2 paragraphs of at least 100 words each, explain why you did not choose the other 2 theologians. In each of these parts, explain why you did not believe the theologian was the most scriptural in his views of government. You may also reference points where you do agree with these theologians.
Therefore, the thread must be laid out as follows: Part 1 must be the theologian you chose, and parts 2 and 3 must be theologians you did not choose. Your thread must be at least 300 words and incorporate 3 citations in current Turabian format. Acceptable sources include the textbooks and the Bible.
Delivering a high-quality product at a reasonable price is not enough anymore.
That’s why we have developed 5 beneficial guarantees that will make your experience with our service enjoyable, easy, and safe.
You have to be 100% sure of the quality of your product to give a money-back guarantee. This describes us perfectly. Make sure that this guarantee is totally transparent.
Read moreEach paper is composed from scratch, according to your instructions. It is then checked by our plagiarism-detection software. There is no gap where plagiarism could squeeze in.
Read moreThanks to our free revisions, there is no way for you to be unsatisfied. We will work on your paper until you are completely happy with the result.
Read moreYour email is safe, as we store it according to international data protection rules. Your bank details are secure, as we use only reliable payment systems.
Read moreBy sending us your money, you buy the service we provide. Check out our terms and conditions if you prefer business talks to be laid out in official language.
Read more